▶ 調査レポート

世界の子宮筋腫治療装置市場(~2027):技術別、治療形態別、地域別

• 英文タイトル:Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market Research Report by Technology, Mode of Treatment, Region - Global Forecast to 2027 - Cumulative Impact of COVID-19

360iResearchが調査・発行した産業分析レポートです。世界の子宮筋腫治療装置市場(~2027):技術別、治療形態別、地域別 / Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market Research Report by Technology, Mode of Treatment, Region - Global Forecast to 2027 - Cumulative Impact of COVID-19 / MRC2301C084資料のイメージです。• レポートコード:MRC2301C084
• 出版社/出版日:360iResearch / 2022年10月
• レポート形態:英語、PDF、248ページ
• 納品方法:Eメール(受注後2-3日)
• 産業分類:医療機器
• 販売価格(消費税別)
  Single User(1名利用、印刷可)¥692,860 (USD4,949)▷ お問い合わせ
  Enterprise License(企業利用、印刷可)¥1,392,860 (USD9,949)▷ お問い合わせ
• ご注文方法:お問い合わせフォーム記入又はEメールでご連絡ください。
• お支払方法:銀行振込(納品後、ご請求書送付)
レポート概要
360iResearch社の本調査レポートは、2021年に461.34百万ドルであった世界の子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模が、2022年に508.17百万ドルになり、2027年まで年平均10.32%で成長して831.99百万ドルに達すると予測しています。本レポートでは、子宮筋腫治療装置の世界市場について調査し、序論、調査方法、エグゼクティブサマリー、市場概要、市場インサイト、技術別(アブレーション技術、塞栓術、腹腔鏡下術、手術)分析、治療形態別(侵襲的治療、低侵襲治療、非侵襲的治療)分析、地域別(南北アメリカ、アメリカ、カナダ、ブラジル、アジア太平洋、日本、中国、インド、韓国、台湾、ヨーロッパ/中東/アフリカ、イギリス、ドイツ、フランス、ロシア、その他)分析、競争状況、企業情報などの項目を掲載しています。本書には、AbbVie Inc.、Advanced Surgical Concepts Limited、AstraZeneca PLC、Boston Scientific Corporation、CONMED Corporation、Cook Group Incorporated、Coopersurgical Inc.、Ethicon, Inc.、Ferring B.V.、GE Healthcare、Gynesonics, Inc、Hologic, Inc.、INSIGHTEC Ltd.、KARL STORZ SE & Co. KG、Lumenis Ltdなどの企業情報が含まれています。
・序論
・調査方法
・エグゼクティブサマリー
・市場概要
・市場インサイト
・世界の子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模:技術別
- アブレーション技術の市場規模
- 塞栓術の市場規模
- 腹腔鏡下術の市場規模
- 手術治療の市場規模
・世界の子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模:治療形態別
- 侵襲的治療の市場規模
- 低侵襲治療の市場規模
- 非侵襲的治療の市場規模
・世界の子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模:地域別
- 南北アメリカの子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
アメリカの子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
カナダの子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
ブラジルの子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
...
- アジア太平洋の子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
日本の子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
中国の子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
インドの子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
韓国の子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
台湾の子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
...
-ヨーロッパ/中東/アフリカの子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
イギリスの子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
ドイツの子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
フランスの子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
ロシアの子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
...
-その他地域の子宮筋腫治療装置市場規模
・競争状況
・企業情報

The Global Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market size was estimated at USD 461.34 million in 2021 and expected to reach USD 508.17 million in 2022, and is projected to grow at a CAGR 10.32% to reach USD 831.99 million by 2027.

Market Statistics:
The report provides market sizing and forecast across 7 major currencies – USD, EUR, JPY, GBP, AUD, CAD, and CHF. It helps organization leaders make better decisions when currency exchange data is readily available. In this report, the years 2018 and 2020 are considered as historical years, 2021 as the base year, 2022 as the estimated year, and years from 2023 to 2027 are considered as the forecast period.

Market Segmentation & Coverage:
This research report categorizes the Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device to forecast the revenues and analyze the trends in each of the following sub-markets:

Based on Technology, the market was studied across Ablation Techniques, Embolization Techniques, Laparoscopic techniques, and Surgical Techniques. The Ablation Techniques is further studied across Cryoablation, Hydrothermal Ablation, Microwave Ablation, and Ultrasound Ablation. The Ultrasound Ablation is further studied across High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) and MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS). The Laparoscopic techniques is further studied across Laparoscopic Myomectomy and Myolysis. The Surgical Techniques is further studied across Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.

Based on Mode of Treatment, the market was studied across Invasive Treatment, Minimally Invasive Treatment, and Non-invasive Treatment.

Based on Region, the market was studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

Cumulative Impact of COVID-19:
COVID-19 is an incomparable global public health emergency that has affected almost every industry, and the long-term effects are projected to impact the industry growth during the forecast period. Our ongoing research amplifies our research framework to ensure the inclusion of underlying COVID-19 issues and potential paths forward. The report delivers insights on COVID-19 considering the changes in consumer behavior and demand, purchasing patterns, re-routing of the supply chain, dynamics of current market forces, and the significant interventions of governments. The updated study provides insights, analysis, estimations, and forecasts, considering the COVID-19 impact on the market.

Cumulative Impact of 2022 Russia Ukraine Conflict:
We continuously monitor and update reports on political and economic uncertainty due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Negative impacts are significantly foreseen globally, especially across Eastern Europe, European Union, Eastern & Central Asia, and the United States. This contention has severely affected lives and livelihoods and represents far-reaching disruptions in trade dynamics. The potential effects of ongoing war and uncertainty in Eastern Europe are expected to have an adverse impact on the world economy, with especially long-term harsh effects on Russia.This report uncovers the impact of demand & supply, pricing variants, strategic uptake of vendors, and recommendations for Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device market considering the current update on the conflict and its global response.

Competitive Strategic Window:
The Competitive Strategic Window analyses the competitive landscape in terms of markets, applications, and geographies to help the vendor define an alignment or fit between their capabilities and opportunities for future growth prospects. It describes the optimal or favorable fit for the vendors to adopt successive merger and acquisition strategies, geography expansion, research & development, and new product introduction strategies to execute further business expansion and growth during a forecast period.

FPNV Positioning Matrix:
The FPNV Positioning Matrix evaluates and categorizes the vendors in the Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market based on Business Strategy (Business Growth, Industry Coverage, Financial Viability, and Channel Support) and Product Satisfaction (Value for Money, Ease of Use, Product Features, and Customer Support) that aids businesses in better decision making and understanding the competitive landscape.

Market Share Analysis:
The Market Share Analysis offers the analysis of vendors considering their contribution to the overall market. It provides the idea of its revenue generation into the overall market compared to other vendors in the space. It provides insights into how vendors are performing in terms of revenue generation and customer base compared to others. Knowing market share offers an idea of the size and competitiveness of the vendors for the base year. It reveals the market characteristics in terms of accumulation, fragmentation, dominance, and amalgamation traits.

Competitive Scenario:
The Competitive Scenario provides an outlook analysis of the various business growth strategies adopted by the vendors. The news covered in this section deliver valuable thoughts at the different stage while keeping up-to-date with the business and engage stakeholders in the economic debate. The competitive scenario represents press releases or news of the companies categorized into Merger & Acquisition, Agreement, Collaboration, & Partnership, New Product Launch & Enhancement, Investment & Funding, and Award, Recognition, & Expansion. All the news collected help vendor to understand the gaps in the marketplace and competitor’s strength and weakness thereby, providing insights to enhance product and service.

Company Usability Profiles:
The report profoundly explores the recent significant developments by the leading vendors and innovation profiles in the Global Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market, including AbbVie Inc., Advanced Surgical Concepts Limited, AstraZeneca PLC, Boston Scientific Corporation, CONMED Corporation, Cook Group Incorporated, Coopersurgical Inc., Ethicon, Inc., Ferring B.V., GE Healthcare, Gynesonics, Inc, Hologic, Inc., INSIGHTEC Ltd., KARL STORZ SE & Co. KG, Lumenis Ltd, Medtronic PLC, Merit Medical Systems, Inc., Minerva Surgical, Inc., Olympus Corporation, PENTAX Medical, Smith & Nephew PLC, and Stryker Corporation.

The report provides insights on the following pointers:
1. Market Penetration: Provides comprehensive information on the market offered by the key players
2. Market Development: Provides in-depth information about lucrative emerging markets and analyze penetration across mature segments of the markets
3. Market Diversification: Provides detailed information about new product launches, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments
4. Competitive Assessment & Intelligence: Provides an exhaustive assessment of market shares, strategies, products, certification, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities of the leading players
5. Product Development & Innovation: Provides intelligent insights on future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments

The report answers questions such as:
1. What is the market size and forecast of the Global Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market?
2. What are the inhibiting factors and impact of COVID-19 shaping the Global Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market during the forecast period?
3. Which are the products/segments/applications/areas to invest in over the forecast period in the Global Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market?
4. What is the competitive strategic window for opportunities in the Global Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market?
5. What are the technology trends and regulatory frameworks in the Global Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market?
6. What is the market share of the leading vendors in the Global Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market?
7. What modes and strategic moves are considered suitable for entering the Global Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market?

レポート目次

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Limitations
1.7. Assumptions
1.8. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology
2.1. Define: Research Objective
2.2. Determine: Research Design
2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
2.4. Collect: Data Source
2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
2.7. Publish: Research Report
2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights
5.1. Market Dynamics
5.1.1. Drivers
5.1.1.1. Increasing occurrence of uterine fibroid worldwide
5.1.1.2. Growing penchant for minimally invasive devices
5.1.1.3. Rising utilization of technologically advanced products
5.1.2. Restraints
5.1.2.1. Shortage of required infrastructure in developing economies
5.1.3. Opportunities
5.1.3.1. Favorable government initiatives by governments and organizations to increase awareness pertinent to uterine fibroid diagnosis
5.1.3.2. Introduction and development of technologically advanced products
5.1.4. Challenges
5.1.4.1. Reduced awareness of the device among population
5.2. Cumulative Impact of COVID-19

6. Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market, by Technology
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Ablation Techniques
6.3.1. Cryoablation
6.3.2. Hydrothermal Ablation
6.3.3. Microwave Ablation
6.3.4. Ultrasound Ablation
6.3.5.1. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)
6.3.5.2. MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS)
6.3. Embolization Techniques
6.4. Laparoscopic techniques
6.5.1. Laparoscopic Myomectomy
6.5.2. Myolysis
6.5. Surgical Techniques
6.6.1. Hysterectomy
6.6.2. Myomectomy

7. Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market, by Mode of Treatment
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Invasive Treatment
7.3. Minimally Invasive Treatment
7.4. Non-invasive Treatment

8. Americas Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Argentina
8.3. Brazil
8.4. Canada
8.5. Mexico
8.6. United States

9. Asia-Pacific Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market
9.1. Introduction
9.2. Australia
9.3. China
9.4. India
9.5. Indonesia
9.6. Japan
9.7. Malaysia
9.8. Philippines
9.9. Singapore
9.10. South Korea
9.11. Taiwan
9.12. Thailand
9.13. Vietnam

10. Europe, Middle East & Africa Uterine Fibroid Treatment Device Market
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Denmark
10.3. Egypt
10.4. Finland
10.5. France
10.6. Germany
10.7. Israel
10.8. Italy
10.9. Netherlands
10.10. Nigeria
10.11. Norway
10.12. Poland
10.13. Qatar
10.14. Russia
10.15. Saudi Arabia
10.16. South Africa
10.17. Spain
10.18. Sweden
10.19. Switzerland
10.20. Turkey
10.21. United Arab Emirates
10.22. United Kingdom

11. Competitive Landscape
11.1. FPNV Positioning Matrix
11.1.1. Quadrants
11.1.2. Business Strategy
11.1.3. Product Satisfaction
11.2. Market Ranking Analysis, By Key Player
11.3. Market Share Analysis, By Key Player
11.4. Competitive Scenario
11.4.1. Merger & Acquisition
11.4.2. Agreement, Collaboration, & Partnership
11.4.3. New Product Launch & Enhancement
11.4.4. Investment & Funding
11.4.5. Award, Recognition, & Expansion

12. Company Usability Profiles
12.1. AbbVie Inc.
12.1.1. Business Overview
12.1.2. Key Executives
12.1.3. Product & Services
12.2. Advanced Surgical Concepts Limited
12.2.1. Business Overview
12.2.2. Key Executives
12.2.3. Product & Services
12.3. AstraZeneca PLC
12.3.1. Business Overview
12.3.2. Key Executives
12.3.3. Product & Services
12.4. Boston Scientific Corporation
12.4.1. Business Overview
12.4.2. Key Executives
12.4.3. Product & Services
12.5. CONMED Corporation
12.5.1. Business Overview
12.5.2. Key Executives
12.5.3. Product & Services
12.6. Cook Group Incorporated
12.6.1. Business Overview
12.6.2. Key Executives
12.6.3. Product & Services
12.7. Coopersurgical Inc.
12.7.1. Business Overview
12.7.2. Key Executives
12.7.3. Product & Services
12.8. Ethicon, Inc.
12.8.1. Business Overview
12.8.2. Key Executives
12.8.3. Product & Services
12.9. Ferring B.V.
12.9.1. Business Overview
12.9.2. Key Executives
12.9.3. Product & Services
12.10. GE Healthcare
12.10.1. Business Overview
12.10.2. Key Executives
12.10.3. Product & Services
12.11. Gynesonics, Inc
12.11.1. Business Overview
12.11.2. Key Executives
12.11.3. Product & Services
12.12. Hologic, Inc.
12.12.1. Business Overview
12.12.2. Key Executives
12.12.3. Product & Services
12.13. INSIGHTEC Ltd.
12.13.1. Business Overview
12.13.2. Key Executives
12.13.3. Product & Services
12.14. KARL STORZ SE & Co. KG
12.14.1. Business Overview
12.14.2. Key Executives
12.14.3. Product & Services
12.15. Lumenis Ltd
12.15.1. Business Overview
12.15.2. Key Executives
12.15.3. Product & Services
12.16. Medtronic PLC
12.16.1. Business Overview
12.16.2. Key Executives
12.16.3. Product & Services
12.17. Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
12.17.1. Business Overview
12.17.2. Key Executives
12.17.3. Product & Services
12.18. Minerva Surgical, Inc.
12.18.1. Business Overview
12.18.2. Key Executives
12.18.3. Product & Services
12.19. Olympus Corporation
12.19.1. Business Overview
12.19.2. Key Executives
12.19.3. Product & Services
12.20. PENTAX Medical
12.20.1. Business Overview
12.20.2. Key Executives
12.20.3. Product & Services
12.21. Smith & Nephew PLC
12.21.1. Business Overview
12.21.2. Key Executives
12.21.3. Product & Services
12.22. Stryker Corporation
12.22.1. Business Overview
12.22.2. Key Executives
12.22.3. Product & Services

13. Appendix
13.1. Discussion Guide
13.2. License & Pricing