• レポートコード:MRC2304I0213 • 出版社/出版日:Persistence Market Research / 2023年1月5日 • レポート形態:英文、PDF、250ページ • 納品方法:Eメール • 産業分類:半導体 |
Single User | ¥735,000 (USD4,900) | ▷ お問い合わせ |
Site Licence | ¥1,140,000 (USD7,600) | ▷ お問い合わせ |
Enterprisewide | ¥1,590,000 (USD10,600) | ▷ お問い合わせ |
• お支払方法:銀行振込(納品後、ご請求書送付)
レポート概要
Persistence Market Research社の本調査資料では、世界の精密農業用画像技術市場について調査・分析を行い、市場の現状と今後の展望を整理しています。本書は、エグゼクティブサマリー、市場概要、主要市場動向、価格分析、需要分析・予測、市場背景、技術別(マルチスペクトル、ハイパースペクトル)分析、製品別(センサ、カメラ、ソフトウェア、その他)分析、地域別(北米、中南米、ヨーロッパ、東アジア、南アジア・太平洋、中東・アフリカ)分析、市場構造分析、競争分析、仮定、調査手法など、以下の構成で掲載しています。また、Tetracam、Bayspec、MicaSense、XIMEA、Teledyne DALSA、Resonon、Pixelteq、Sentek Technologies、Quest-Innovations BV、4D Technologies、Othersなどの企業情報が含まれています。 ・エグゼクティブサマリー ・市場概要 ・主要市場動向 ・価格分析 ・需要分析・予測 ・市場背景 ・世界の精密農業用画像技術市場規模:技術別 - マルチスペクトルにおける市場規模 - ハイパースペクトルにおける市場規模 ・世界の精密農業用画像技術市場規模:製品別 - センサの市場規模 - カメラの市場規模 - ソフトウェアの市場規模 - その他製品の市場規模 ・世界の精密農業用画像技術市場規模:地域別 - 北米の精密農業用画像技術市場規模 - 中南米の精密農業用画像技術市場規模 - ヨーロッパの精密農業用画像技術市場規模 - 東アジアの精密農業用画像技術市場規模 - 南アジア・太平洋の精密農業用画像技術市場規模 - 中東・アフリカの精密農業用画像技術市場規模 ・市場構造分析 ・競争分析 ・仮定 ・調査手法 |
Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market – Report Scope
Persistence Market Research recently published a new report on the imaging technology for precision agriculture market. The report provides a detailed valuation on key market dynamics, such as the drivers, trends, opportunities, and restraints, along with detailed information about the market structure. This research report presents exclusive facts and figures about how the imaging technology for precision agriculture market will grow over the forecast period of 2023 to 2033.
Key indicators of market background, such as value chain analysis and supply chain, compounded annual growth rate (CAGR), and year-on-year (Y-o-Y) growth of the market are explained in Persistence Market Research’s study in a comprehensive manner. This information can help readers understand the quantitative development projections of the imaging technology for precision agriculture market over the forecast period.
The study is relevant for stakeholders in the imaging technology for precision agriculture market, as well as manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, and investors, as it can help them understand applicable strategies to grow in the market. Stakeholders, investors, industry experts, researchers, and journalists, as well as business researchers in market can leverage the information and statistics presented in this research report.
The report includes facts & figures related to the micro as well as macro-economic factors that are impacting the growth of the imaging technology for precision agriculture market. The study also offers actionable insights based on future trends in the market. Furthermore, domestic players and new entrants in the market can also use the information presented in this report to make business decisions and gain momentum in the market.
Key Segments of Market
Persistence Market Research’s study on the imaging technology for precision agriculture market is divided into three significant segments: technique, product and region. This report offers comprehensive data and information about the important market dynamics and growth parameters related to these categories.
Technique
Multispectral
Hyperspectral
Product
Sensors
Cameras
Software
Other Products
Region
North America
Latin America
Europe
East Asia
South Asia Pacific
Middle East and Africa
Key Questions Answered in Report
Which region is anticipated to hold a prominent market share over the forecast period?
What will be the key driving factors propelling the demand imaging technology for precision agriculture across the world during the forecast period?
How current trends will impact the imaging technology for precision agriculture market?
Who are significant market participants in the market?
What are the crucial strategies of prominent players in the imaging technology for precision agriculture market to upscale their positions in this landscape?
Research Methodology
In Persistence Market Research’s research report, exclusive research methodology is utilized to conduct comprehensive research on the development of the imaging technology for precision agriculture market, and reach conclusions on the future growth factors of the market. In this research methodology, secondary and primary research is utilized by analysts to ensure the precision and reliability of the conclusions.
Secondary resources are referred by analysts during the evaluation of the imaging technology for precision agriculture market study, which comprises of facts and figures from white papers, trade journals, and external and internal databases. Analysts have thoroughly interviewed several industry experts, such as sales supervisors, sales operation managers, product portfolio managers, senior managers, market intelligence managers, marketing/product managers, engineering managers, and production managers to provide insightful information.
Comprehensive information acquired from primary and secondary resources is validated by companies operating in the imaging technology for precision agriculture market, to make Persistence Market Research’s projections on the growth prospects of the market more accurate and reliable.
レポート目次1. Executive Summary
1.1. Global Market Outlook
1.2. Demand Side Trends
1.3. Supply Side Trends
1.4. Analysis and Recommendations
2. Market Overview
2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy
2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations
3. Key Market Trends
3.1. Key Trends Impacting the Market
3.2. Product Innovation / Development Trends
4. Pricing Analysis
4.1. Pricing Analysis, By Component
4.1.1. Hardware Pricing Analysis
4.1.2. Software Pricing Analysis
4.2. Average Pricing Analysis Benchmark
5. Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Demand (in Value in US$ Mn) Analysis 2018-2022 and Forecast, 2023-2033
5.1. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Analysis, 2018-2022
5.2. Current and Future Market Value (US$ Mn) Projections, 2023-2033
5.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
5.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis
6. Market Background
6.1. Macro-Economic Factors
6.2. Forecast Factors – Relevance & Impact
6.3. Value Chain
6.4. COVID-19 Crisis – Impact Assessment
6.4.1. Current Statistics
6.4.2. Short-Mid-Long Term Outlook
6.4.3. Likely Rebound
6.5. Market Dynamics
6.5.1. Drivers
6.5.2. Restraints
6.5.3. Opportunities
7. Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis 2018-2022 and Forecast 2023-2033, by Technique
7.1. Introduction / Key Findings
7.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Technique, 2018 – 2022
7.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Technique, 2023 – 2033
7.3.1. Multispectral
7.3.2. Hyperspectral
7.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Technique
8. Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis 2018-2022 and Forecast 2023-2033, by Product
8.1. Introduction / Key Findings
8.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Product, 2018 – 2022
8.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Product, 2023 – 2033
8.3.1. Sensors
8.3.2. Cameras
8.3.3. Software
8.3.4. Other Products
8.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Product
9. Global Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis 2018-2022 and Forecast 2023-2033, by Region
9.1. Introduction / Key Findings
9.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Region, 2018 – 2022
9.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2023 – 2033
9.3.1. North America
9.3.2. Latin America
9.3.3. Europe
9.3.4. East Asia
9.3.5. South Asia & Pacific
9.3.6. Middle East and Africa (MEA)
9.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region
10. North America Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis 2018-2022 and Forecast 2023-2033
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 – 2022
10.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 – 2033
10.3.1. By Technique
10.3.2. By Product
10.3.3. By Country
10.3.3.1. U.S.
10.3.3.2. Canada
10.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
10.4.1. By Technique
10.4.2. By Product
10.4.3. By Country
10.5. Market Trends
10.6. Key Market Participants – Intensity Mapping
11. Latin America Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis 2018-2022 and Forecast 2023-2033
11.1. Introduction
11.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 – 2022
11.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 – 2033
11.3.1. By Technique
11.3.2. By Product
11.3.3. By Country
11.3.3.1. Brazil
11.3.3.2. Mexico
11.3.3.3. Rest of Latin America
11.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
11.4.1. By Technique
11.4.2. By Product
11.4.3. By Country
12. Europe Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis 2018-2022 and Forecast 2023-2033
12.1. Introduction
12.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 – 2022
12.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 – 2033
12.3.1. By Technique
12.3.2. By Product
12.3.3. By Country
12.3.3.1. Germany
12.3.3.2. Italy
12.3.3.3. France
12.3.3.4. U.K.
12.3.3.5. Spain
12.3.3.6. BENELUX
12.3.3.7. Russia
12.3.3.8. Rest of Europe
12.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
12.4.1. By Technique
12.4.2. By Product
12.4.3. By Country
13. South Asia & Pacific Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis 2018-2022 and Forecast 2023-2033
13.1. Introduction
13.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 – 2022
13.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 – 2033
13.3.1. By Technique
13.3.2. By Product
13.3.3. By Country
13.3.3.1. India
13.3.3.2. Indonesia
13.3.3.3. Malaysia
13.3.3.4. Singapore
13.3.3.5. Australia & New Zealand
13.3.3.6. Rest of South Asia and Pacific
13.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
13.4.1. By Technique
13.4.2. By Product
13.4.3. By Country
14. East Asia Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis 2018-2022 and Forecast 2023-2033
14.1. Introduction
14.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 – 2022
14.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 – 2033
14.3.1. By Technique
14.3.2. By Product
14.3.3. By Country
14.3.3.1. China
14.3.3.2. Japan
14.3.3.3. South Korea
14.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
14.4.1. By Technique
14.4.2. By Product
14.4.3. By Country
15. Middle East and Africa Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis 2018-2022 and Forecast 2023-2033
15.1. Introduction
15.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2018 – 2022
15.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2023 – 2033
15.3.1. By Technique
15.3.2. By Product
15.3.3. By Country
15.3.3.1. GCC Countries
15.3.3.2. Turkey
15.3.3.3. South Africa
15.3.3.4. Rest of Middle East and Africa
15.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis
15.4.1. By Technique
15.4.2. By Product
15.4.3. By Country
16. Key Countries Analysis- Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market
16.1. U.S. Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.1.1. By Technique
16.1.2. By Product
16.2. Canada Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.2.1. By Technique
16.2.2. By Product
16.3. Mexico Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.3.1. By Technique
16.3.2. By Product
16.4. Brazil Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.4.1. By Technique
16.4.2. By Product
16.5. Germany Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.5.1. By Technique
16.5.2. By Product
16.6. Italy Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.6.1. By Technique
16.6.2. By Product
16.7. France Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.7.1. By Technique
16.7.2. By Product
16.8. U.K. Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.8.1. By Technique
16.8.2. By Product
16.9. Spain Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.9.1. By Technique
16.9.2. By Product
16.10. BENELUX Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.10.1. By Technique
16.10.2. By Product
16.11. Russia Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.11.1. By Technique
16.11.2. By Product
16.12. Rest of Europe Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.12.1. By Technique
16.12.2. By Product
16.13. China Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.13.1. By Technique
16.13.2. By Product
16.14. Japan Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.14.1. By Technique
16.14.2. By Product
16.15. South Korea Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.15.1. By Technique
16.15.2. By Product
16.16. India Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.16.1. By Technique
16.16.2. By Product
16.17. Malaysia Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.17.1. By Technique
16.17.2. By Product
16.18. Indonesia Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.18.1. By Technique
16.18.2. By Product
16.19. Singapore Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.19.1. By Technique
16.19.2. By Product
16.20. Australia and New Zealand Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.20.1. By Technique
16.20.2. By Product
16.21. GCC Countries Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.21.1. By Technique
16.21.2. By Product
16.22. Turkey Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.22.1. By Technique
16.22.2. By Product
16.23. South Africa Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.23.1. By Technique
16.23.2. By Product
16.24. Rest of Middle East and Africa Imaging Technology for Precision Agriculture Market Analysis
16.24.1. By Technique
16.24.2. By Product
17. Market Structure Analysis
17.1. Market Analysis by Tier of Companies
17.2. Market Share Analysis of Top Players
17.3. Market Presence Analysis
18. Competition Analysis
18.1. Competition Dashboard
18.2. Competition Benchmarking
18.3. Competition Deep Dive
18.3.1. Tetracam
18.3.1.1. Business Overview
18.3.1.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.1.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.1.4. Key Strategy & Developments
18.3.2. Bayspec
18.3.2.1. Business Overview
18.3.2.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.2.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.2.4. Key Strategy & Developments
18.3.3. MicaSense
18.3.3.1. Business Overview
18.3.3.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.3.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.3.4. Key Strategy & Developments
18.3.4. XIMEA
18.3.4.1. Business Overview
18.3.4.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.4.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.4.4. Key Strategy & Developments
18.3.5. Teledyne DALSA
18.3.5.1. Business Overview
18.3.5.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.5.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.5.4. Key Strategy & Developments
18.3.6. Resonon
18.3.6.1. Business Overview
18.3.6.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.6.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.6.4. Key Strategy & Developments
18.3.7. Pixelteq
18.3.7.1. Business Overview
18.3.7.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.7.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.7.4. Key Strategy & Developments
18.3.8. Sentek Technologies
18.3.8.1. Business Overview
18.3.8.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.8.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.8.4. Key Strategy & Developments
18.3.9. Quest-Innovations BV
18.3.9.1. Business Overview
18.3.9.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.9.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.9.4. Key Strategy & Developments
18.3.10. 4D Technologies
18.3.10.1. Business Overview
18.3.10.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.10.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.10.4. Key Strategy & Developments
18.3.11. Others
18.3.11.1. Business Overview
18.3.11.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.11.3. Profitability by Market Segments (Business Segments/Region)
18.3.11.4. Key Strategy & Developments
19. Assumptions and Acronyms Used
20. Research Methodology